The agent Russ Gregory, Gregory Design Group, gave a brief overview of the application.
Monika Sadler, Planner I, gave a presentation on the application.
There was one public comment and five public speakers.
The public speakers were Kyle Gorgan: 291 Post Office Road, Reinhold Kowaluk: 292 Post Office Road, Alan Higgins: 303 Lake Drive North Randy Pegg : 290 Post Office Road and David O’Hara: 288 Post Office Road. Each member of the public was given the opportunity to speak, there were many concerns that were raised by the public. The concerns were the setbacks from the property lines, if there was to be a fire it is close to the existing fence which would cause other buildings to catch fire, maintenance of the proposed garage, shadowing the neighbours properties, the view of the lake, coverage of the lot, lack of green space, impact on surrounding property values, affect enjoyment of properties, possibility of renting out the loft space, lack of privacy, and the overall size of the proposed garage.
Mr. Gregory responded to the public concerns.
Committee member Karen Whitney noted that there is a one foot four-inch overhang off the eaves. It was then asked if the requested setback is from the eaves or the overhang. Mr. Gregory advised that the requested setback is from the building, the eaves will be eight inches off the lot line with two feet. Committee member Karen Whitney then asked how they would access the back or the side of the garage for maintenance. Mr. Gregory advised the two feet is enough space to put a ladder up, the prefinished siding and aluminum can be put up by ladders. There is no eavestrough on the one side as it is a gable end. Committee member Karen Whitney asked what the proposed siding will be and if it needs to be fireproof. Mr. Gregory advised that at a two feet setback it is not required to be fire rated and that it would be a Maybeck pre-finished siding, if the setback is less then two feet it would need to be fire rated (ie stucco) this will be dealt with at building permit stage.
Committee member Chris Burns asked why they couldn’t comply with the current setbacks. Mr. Gregory advised that the existing garage is currently 8 inches off the lot line, the proposed garage will be moved over to 2 feet. If the proposed garage was moved over more, it will be hard to get a car in the garage due to the depth of the house.
Committee member Chris Burns asked if the garage needed to be that tall. Mr. Gregory advised that they could lower the slopes, currently the proposed height is only 1.5 metres over what is allowed in the by-law for the height. They can lower the height of the eaves by 1.5 inches. Ultimately, they are trying to get some decent space for the storage loft.
Committee member Chris Burns asked if the rear elevation would be facing east, and if they are permitted to have openings on that face of the building. Mr. Gregory advised that at four feet they would be able to have the window, but they will lose that window if they go down to a 2 feet set-back. Committee member Chris Burns asked if there was a current survey showing the garage. Mr. Gregory advised that the lot lines, were taken from the surveyor.
Committee Chair John Rogers advised that the committee may impose a term to not have plumbing fixtures in the garage, it was confirmed with Mr. Gregory that they are not opposed to the potential term being added.
Committee member Chris Burns motioned to approve the application. There were no seconders to approve the application.
Committee member Karen Whitney motioned to approve the application for the increased heigh and deny the application for the decreased setbacks.
Committee member Chris Burns seconded this motion.
Mr. Gregory asked if they went down to three feet by three feet setback instead of four feet by four feet, and if it was it possible to increase the setbacks to 0.91 metres. Committee member Karen Whitney advised that they were concerned about the side yard setback, normally when you go higher you move away from the side yard you don’t move closer. Committee member Karen Whitney advised that 1.2 metres is not an appropriate set back for a building like this.
Lynda Rogers apposed the application
Following the vote, Committee Chair John Rogers advised that the application was approved for the height of the proposed garage and denied for the setbacks of the proposed garage and is subject to a 20-day appeal period and two years to meet all conditions.